> On Nov. 21, 2013, 6:54 p.m., Burkhard L?ck wrote: > > For such a "small" docbook the bokk is kind of overkill. > > I would prefer an article here as used in the other agent docbooks. > > Burkhard L?ck wrote: > Why were these comments (translatable entity / change from book to > article etcdiscarded?
I did not get email or page refresh notification .. did not see these. Fixed in new diff - Scarlett ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114001/#review44158 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Nov. 22, 2013, 6:14 p.m., Scarlett Clark wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114001/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 22, 2013, 6:14 p.m.) > > > Review request for Documentation, KDEPIM and Laurent Montel. > > > Repository: kdepim > > > Description > ------- > > Documentation: Updated Akonadi Folder Archive Agent doc to include use case > and clear instructions with pic. > > > Diffs > ----- > > doc/akonadi_folderarchive_agent/index.docbook 41f4ca3 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114001/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > checkxml and meinproc4 (viewed in khelpcenter). EBN down. > > > File Attachments > ---------------- > > New Changes > > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/11/22/d5cff9fa-c218-4218-b4cc-567ea86907d4__folderarchiveagent2 > > > Thanks, > > Scarlett Clark > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-doc-english/attachments/20131122/fda3e736/attachment.html>
