El Dimarts, 3 de febrer de 2015, a les 12:17:44, Yuri Chornoivan va escriure: > ???????? Mon, 02 Feb 2015 23:45:47 +0200, Albert Astals Cid > > <aacid at kde.org>: > > El Diumenge, 1 de febrer de 2015, a les 02:36:06, Eloy Cuadra va > > > > escriure: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I don't know if this is really important but in the docbook's author > >> guide > >> (http://l10n.kde.org/docs/markup/index.html) we can read in the page > >> about > >> the Prologue section (http://l10n.kde.org/docs/markup/prologue.html) > >> that > >> > >> the <date> field must contain only ISO dates in the form "yyyy-mm-dd": > >> <date> > >> > >> The date is very important. It is used not only by scripts for > >> > >> automatic > >> processing of documentation, but is also central to revision control and > >> co-ordination of translations. You must change the date if you have > >> changed > >> the original document, and you must not change the date if you are a > >> translator. The format of the date is very important. It must be in the > >> ISO, with ?literal? delimiters, in the form ?yyyy-mm-dd?. Please be > >> extremely careful about this, and triple check it before you send in the > >> document. > >> > >> Well, the KDE's original docbook files are plenty of dates that don't > >> follow > >> this rule (and also the corresponding translated PO files). > >> > >> Is it advisable to fix this issue now? This issue concerns a lot of > >> english > >> documentation in both stable and trunk branches (for kde4 and kf5). > > > > That's a good question. Had a look at the docbook documentation on > > http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/date.html and it says there's no > > expected > > format for the date. > > > > So i guess this may have been a self-imposed version so that people knew > > what > > to translate from. > > > > I looked in svn but the commit that introduced that sentence doesn't say > > anything about it and Nicolas doesn't seem to be around anymore to > > answer the > > question. > > > > So i guess we should decide ourselves, do we want to enforce that or not? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Albert > > > > P.S: CC'ed the kde-doc-enlgish ml > > > >> Cheers > > Hi, > > That's not the first time when this question arises. It was a proposal by > Burkhard to have a consistent date/time format.
You sure? That text is back from 2005 or something. Cheers, Albert > > There were no objections to this. I think anyone with git access can fix > the dates if found this appropriate without a confirmation. > > Best regards, > Yuri > _______________________________________________ > kde-doc-english mailing list > kde-doc-english at kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-doc-english
