Am Mittwoch, 8. Juli 2015, 20:09:34 schrieb Yuri Chornoivan: > напиÑане Wed, 08 Jul 2015 19:56:03 +0300, Burkhard Lück > > > > > our pages on techbase (Projects/Documentation + KDE4_(health_table) are > > still > > about kde4, with the kde4 modules kdebase-workspace, kdebase-runtime etc. > > > > From my pov it is time to track KF5 (Frameworks, Workspace) instead of > > the > > corresponding kde4 modules, so we should have Frameworks + Workspace + > > application modules + extragear modules + playground modules. > > > > Having too much pages for every numbered release just makes the thing more > complicated that it should, imho.
You got me wrong or probably I did not explain it very well, sorry. I don't want to have more pages. > Can we just mark the KF5-based releases > somehow? May it be that just a multiplication sign (*) will be enough for > KF5? > I believe this will lead to great confusion, there are too many kf5 docbooks which moved to another repo. * I am pretty sure there will be no kde4 docbook updates for code which is already kf5 - any docbook update will happen for the kf5 version in this case * we tracked always the devel status in the health table to have an overview of the status, see what was outdated and what could be backported, therefore we need to track kf5 here * we have ~ 50 kf5 docbooks (frameworks + ~35 kcm docbooks + a few app docbooks), too many to mix this with the kde4 status into one table What I have in mind is to delete everything in kdelibs/kde-runtime/kde- baseapps which is no longer in kf5 and move the rest into the proper kf5 modules frameworks, workspace etc. > I can do anything needed. > Thanks for stepping up -- Burkhard Lück
