> On Juni 7, 2016, 9:39 nachm., Luigi Toscano wrote: > > doc/index.docbook, line 51 > > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127991/diff/2/?file=465544#file465544line51> > > > > I wonder if we could agree on a more stable version than using the git > > revision :)
sure I'm all for it, but the about dialog or kdesvn --version says "kdesvn 1.7.40 (rev: ca4515f)" > On Juni 7, 2016, 9:39 nachm., Luigi Toscano wrote: > > doc/index.docbook, line 2372 > > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127991/diff/2/?file=465544#file465544line2372> > > > > This should be probably removed (pending comments from maintainers) I would remove the <chapter id="faq"> completely, many things are from kde4 better less but correct infos - Burkhard ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127991/#review96269 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Mai 27, 2016, 6:14 nachm., Burkhard Lück wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127991/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Mai 27, 2016, 6:14 nachm.) > > > Review request for Documentation and Christian Ehrlicher. > > > Repository: kdesvn > > > Description > ------- > > proofread + update > remove comments > bump date+releaseinfo > from kde, not for kde > add some missing items > remove appendix > > > What is "Logs follow node changes"? > > Do we really need the FAQ, seems outdated to me? > > > Diffs > ----- > > doc/index.docbook 3594b5c > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127991/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > passes checkXML5 > > > Thanks, > > Burkhard Lück > >
_______________________________________________ kde-doc-english mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-doc-english
