> On Set. 21, 2016, 12:38 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
> > Would it make more sense to change meinproc5 to work like checkXML5 if 
> > invoked with that name (hardlink, copy, etc, a-la busybox)?
> 
> Ralf Habacker wrote:
>     Sorry, I do not know the reasons why this tool has been created and has 
> not been integrated into meinproc5. You should ask the original author.
> 
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
>     The original author (Laurent Montel, 
> https://websvn.kde.org/?view=revision&revision=505145) don't remember much, 
> and I guess it's not relevant here. My question was: from a multiplatform 
> prospective, would this solution have any drawback? Where "this solution" is: 
> have a checkXML5(.exe) executable which is an hardlink (or a copy, I guess, 
> on Windows) to meinproc5, but exposing the behavior of the wrapper script?
> 
> Ralf Habacker wrote:
>     Pro's:
>     - no additional source/cmake target/binary to maintain 
>     
>     Neg's:
>     - increase the complexibility of meinproc5 caused by the need to support 
> of additional 'checkXML5' use case
>     - more efforts required to maintain the related man pages caused by the 
> dualism  e.g. 'Do I need to update "meinproc5" or "checkXML5" man page 
>     - duplicated executable on windows caused by pysical copy (hardlinks are 
> not supported by cmake as far as I know)
>     
>     Seeing this I would stay with the checkXML5 executable introduced with 
> this request.

I see; then fine by me. Even if I maybe mark checkXML as deprecated at some 
point to not forget to remove it for Frameworks 6. But this is the far future 
of >=4 years from now anyway :)


- Luigi


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128968/#review99350
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Set. 21, 2016, 11:35 a.m., Ralf Habacker wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128968/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Set. 21, 2016, 11:35 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and Luigi Toscano.
> 
> 
> Repository: kdoctools
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Convert checkxml5 into a qt executable for cross plattform support.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt 8674faaba6346156907aa5fbbea1ee2b38865eda 
>   checkXML5.in.cmake d7a57c78ec768a4eb9d3c669b8fe3bbef2991c93 
>   src/CMakeLists.txt 6f903b542bc9ba256dd379275567d5ff2127fe39 
>   src/checkXML5.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128968/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> compiled at 
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:rhabacker:branches:KDE:Frameworks526/kdoctools
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ralf Habacker
> 
>

Reply via email to