Git commit 6185e25d228876754e468a115ca5e4c5557ce434 by Antoni Bella Pérez.
Committed on 16/01/2018 at 13:26.
Pushed by bellaperez into branch 'master'.

Fixes.

M  +1    -1    digikam/editor-cm-monitor.docbook
M  +2    -2    digikam/editor-cm-rawfile.docbook
M  +1    -1    digikam/tool-dlnaserver.docbook

https://commits.kde.org/digikam-doc/6185e25d228876754e468a115ca5e4c5557ce434

diff --git a/digikam/editor-cm-monitor.docbook 
b/digikam/editor-cm-monitor.docbook
index 1e1cccf..fd07a8f 100644
--- a/digikam/editor-cm-monitor.docbook
+++ b/digikam/editor-cm-monitor.docbook
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
         </para>
 
         <blockquote><para>
-            Calibration is a process where a device is brought into some 
defined state by making adjustments to its controls or some other physical 
means.  For example, the act of calibrating a monitor involves adjusting its 
white point, black level, luminosity and gamma to predetermined or standard 
values using the monitor's controls and by altering the video card gamma 
ramp... In contrast to calibration, the process of creating a profile is a 
characterization of the device that does not involve making any changes or 
adjustments to the device. Rather it is a measurement process that results in a 
file that contains a precise mathematical description of the device's color and 
tonality characteristics. This file is an ICC profile. These characteristics 
include the transfer function from the device's color space to a standardized 
absolute color space (this is called a Profile Color Space, PCS, in an ICC 
profile), the device's white point, black point, primaries and other 
information.  Displays are normally characterized (profiled) in their 
calibrated state. To summarize, calibration makes changes to the device to 
alter it's color reproduction characteristics to conform to some predetermined 
state.   Profiling or characterization is a measurement process that results in 
a detailed description of the device's (normally calibrated) color reproduction 
characteristics. (cited from <ulink 
url="http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/Re-Color-Managed-View-How-td1739136.html#a14160285";>here</ulink>)
+            Calibration is a process where a device is brought into some 
defined state by making adjustments to its controls or some other physical 
means. For example, the act of calibrating a monitor involves adjusting its 
white point, black level, luminosity and gamma to predetermined or standard 
values using the monitor's controls and by altering the video card gamma 
ramp... In contrast to calibration, the process of creating a profile is a 
characterization of the device that does not involve making any changes or 
adjustments to the device. Rather it is a measurement process that results in a 
file that contains a precise mathematical description of the device's color and 
tonality characteristics. This file is an ICC profile. These characteristics 
include the transfer function from the device's color space to a standardized 
absolute color space (this is called a Profile Color Space, PCS, in an ICC 
profile), the device's white point, black point, primaries and other 
information. Displays are normally characterized (profiled) in their calibrated 
state. To summarize, calibration makes changes to the device to alter it's 
color reproduction characteristics to conform to some predetermined state. 
Profiling or characterization is a measurement process that results in a 
detailed description of the device's (normally calibrated) color reproduction 
characteristics. (cited from <ulink 
url="http://digikam.1695700.n4.nabble.com/Re-Color-Managed-View-How-td1739136.html#a14160285";>here</ulink>)
         </para></blockquote>
 
         <para>
diff --git a/digikam/editor-cm-rawfile.docbook 
b/digikam/editor-cm-rawfile.docbook
index 64fe1b6..d4c5dbf 100644
--- a/digikam/editor-cm-rawfile.docbook
+++ b/digikam/editor-cm-rawfile.docbook
@@ -39,11 +39,11 @@
         </title>
 
         <para>
-            When you take a picture, presumably you have an idea of what you 
want the final image to look like.  It is much easier to achieve that final 
image if you don't have to "undo" stuff that has already been done to your 
image.  Once Canon (or Nikon, or Bibble, &etc;) has applied their proprietary 
S-curves and shadow-denoising, sharpening, &etc; to your image, then your 
shadows, highlights, edge detail, &etc; are already squashed, clipped, chopped, 
and otherwise altered and mangled.  You've thrown information away and you 
cannot get it back.  Especially in the shadows, even with 16-bit images 
(actually, 12- or 14-bits, depending on the camera, but it's encoded as 16-bits 
for the computer's convenience), there just isn't that much information to 
begin with.
+            When you take a picture, presumably you have an idea of what you 
want the final image to look like. It is much easier to achieve that final 
image if you don't have to "undo" stuff that has already been done to your 
image. Once Canon (or Nikon, or Bibble, &etc;) has applied their proprietary 
S-curves and shadow-denoising, sharpening, &etc; to your image, then your 
shadows, highlights, edge detail, &etc; are already squashed, clipped, chopped, 
and otherwise altered and mangled. You've thrown information away and you 
cannot get it back. Especially in the shadows, even with 16-bit images 
(actually, 12- or 14-bits, depending on the camera, but it's encoded as 16-bits 
for the computer's convenience), there just isn't that much information to 
begin with.
         </para>
 
         <para>
-            It seems to me that the heart and soul of image processing is the 
deliberate manipulation of image tonality, color, selective sharpening, and so 
forth, such that the viewer focuses in on what you, the photographer, found of 
particular interest when you took the picture. Why give the art of image 
processing over to some proprietary raw processing software?  In other words, 
"flat is good" if you'd rather give your images your own artistic 
interpretation.  The alternative is to let the canned, proprietary algorithms 
produced by Canon, Nikon, Bibble, &etc; interpret your images for you.  (On the 
other hand, there is no denying that for many images, those canned algorithms 
are really pretty good!)
+            It seems to me that the heart and soul of image processing is the 
deliberate manipulation of image tonality, color, selective sharpening, and so 
forth, such that the viewer focuses in on what you, the photographer, found of 
particular interest when you took the picture. Why give the art of image 
processing over to some proprietary raw processing software?  In other words, 
"flat is good" if you'd rather give your images your own artistic 
interpretation. The alternative is to let the canned, proprietary algorithms 
produced by Canon, Nikon, Bibble, &etc; interpret your images for you. (On the 
other hand, there is no denying that for many images, those canned algorithms 
are really pretty good!)
         </para>
 
     </sect3>
diff --git a/digikam/tool-dlnaserver.docbook b/digikam/tool-dlnaserver.docbook
index c647995..adb99ff 100644
--- a/digikam/tool-dlnaserver.docbook
+++ b/digikam/tool-dlnaserver.docbook
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ DLNA Mediaserver is used to automatically export &digikam; 
photos through the lo
 </para>
 <sect1><title>Starting The Server</title>
 <para>
-    To start the mediaserver, head to the right bar and click the 
<guilabel>Tools</guilabel> menu. You will find the dlna server icon as shown in 
the next photo. You can also start it from the <guimenu>Tools</guimenu> menu in 
the main toolbar.
+    To start the mediaserver, head to the right bar and click the 
<guilabel>Tools</guilabel> menu. You will find the dlna server icon as shown in 
the next screenshot. You can also start it from the <guimenu>Tools</guimenu> 
menu in the main toolbar.
 </para>
 
 <para>

Reply via email to