lueck added a comment.
In D11147#221123 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D11147#221123>, @rkflx wrote: > Sorry for not keeping you in the loop. We only had the best intentions ;) Feel free to remind us again if we forget to bump something. No need for excuse > Could you tell us more about the ideal doc workflow? Currently we tried to update the docbook (in Spectacle, mainly) as soon as we changed something. Do you prefer we'd not do that and instead to write it all yourself? Or perform docbook changes always in a follow-up patch in order to avoid spamming the doc team with excessive technical review noise? Your workflow updating the docbook together with the code change is really appreciated, thanks. Getting mails on firstname.lastname@example.org about documentation related changes in GUI or docbook is definitely no spam ;-) The documentation team gets a mail on email@example.com via a hook implemented by our famous sysadmins about any commit where a docbook is changed or added. But that is too late for the documentation team to comment on a current review. Therefore lease add the group Documentation as reviewer for any change related to GUI or docbook content Thanks a lot REPOSITORY R260 Gwenview REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D11147 To: lueck, #gwenview, #documentation, ngraham, rkflx