Git commit 1599677064d794e6fa66e108f9ef8445365f2a9f by Jasem Mutlaq, on behalf 
of Joseph McGee.
Committed on 10/01/2024 at 11:40.
Pushed by mutlaqja into branch 'master'.

sub-exposure calculator documentation updates

M  +4    -4    doc/ekos-capture.docbook
M  +-    --    doc/exposure-calculator.png
M  +1    -1    kstars/ekos/capture/capture.ui
M  +1    -1    
kstars/ekos/capture/exposurecalculator/exposurecalculatordialog.cpp
M  +14   -2    
kstars/ekos/capture/exposurecalculator/exposurecalculatordialog.ui

https://invent.kde.org/education/kstars/-/commit/1599677064d794e6fa66e108f9ef8445365f2a9f

diff --git a/doc/ekos-capture.docbook b/doc/ekos-capture.docbook
index 597cd5bf25..6d8ee36371 100644
--- a/doc/ekos-capture.docbook
+++ b/doc/ekos-capture.docbook
@@ -545,8 +545,8 @@ Approaches to imaging can vary greatly in the selection of 
exposure times, and n
                         <listitem>
                             <para>
                                 <guilabel>Sky Quality</guilabel>: The 
<guimenu>Sky Quality selector</guimenu> sets the measurement of the magnitude 
per square arc-second of the background sky.</para>
-                            <para>The range for Sky Quality is from 22 for the 
darkest skies, to 16 for the brightest (most light-polluted) skies. The 
magnitude scale is non-linear; it is a logarithmic scale based on the 5th root 
of 100. So 5 steps on the scale represent a change in brightness by a factor of 
100. (A Sky Quality of 17 is 100 times as bright as a Sky Quality of 22. Each 
full integer step on the scale is a change by a factor of approximately 
2.512.). <ulink url="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_pollution";>Wikipedia 
Sky Brightness</ulink>  
-<ulink url="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_pollution";>Wikipedia Light 
Pollution</ulink></para>
+                            <para>The range for Sky Quality is from 22 for the 
darkest skies, to 16 for the brightest (most light-polluted) skies. The 
magnitude scale is non-linear; it is a logarithmic scale based on the 5th root 
of 100. So 5 steps on the scale represent a change in brightness by a factor of 
100. (A Sky Quality of 17 is 100 times as bright as a Sky Quality of 22. Each 
full integer step on the scale is a change by a factor of approximately 
2.512.). <ulink url= "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sky_brightness";>Wikipedia 
Sky Brightness</ulink>  
+<ulink url= "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_pollution";>Wikipedia Light 
Pollution</ulink></para>
                             <para>
                                All light scattered in the background sky is 
considered to be light pollution regardless of its source, so the effects of 
moonlight should be considered as "natural" light pollution. But weather 
conditions can also impact Sky Quality, as humidity or cloud cover can reflect 
and scatter any source of light through the atmosphere</para>
                             <para>
@@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ Approaches to imaging can vary greatly in the selection of 
exposure times, and n
                         </listitem>
                         <listitem>
                             <para>
-                                <guilabel>Focal Ratio</guilabel>: The selector 
for <guimenu>Focal Ratio</guimenu> set the value from the optical train, which 
is needed for the evaluation of light gathering capability.</para>
+                                <guilabel>Focal Ratio</guilabel>: The selector 
for <guimenu>Focal Ratio</guimenu> sets the value from the optical train, which 
is needed for the evaluation of light gathering capability.</para>
                             <para>
                                 The value of the focal ratio of the optic has 
a direct effect on the exposure calculation. A lower focal ratio is considered 
to be a "faster optic" as it has a greater light gathering capability than an 
optic with a longer focal ratio. So the exposure calculation will be reduced 
when a lower focal ratio is used, and increased when a higher focal ratio is 
used.</para>
                             <para>
@@ -691,7 +691,7 @@ For a strong target, (example, Orion Nebula with magnitude 
4), would provide a r
 </para>
 
 <para>
-Depending on the various inputs and imaging conditions, the potential quality 
of a sub-exposure can vary greatly. In poor sky quality with little or no 
filtering, the computed sub-exposure time will naturally be short to avoid an 
overwhelming noise from light pollution, and the exposure time relative to the 
computed noise will be low (a low time/noise ratio). To achieve a high quality 
integrated image from low time/noise ratio sub-exposures may require thousands 
sub-exposures.  If the user is concerned about imaging and processing time or 
storage capacity; then a higher time/noise ratio would needed to reduce the 
quantity of sub-exposures. Conversely, when input conditions result in a 
sub-exposure with a long exposure time relative to the computed noise (as with 
narrow-band imaging), the result is a sub-exposure with a very high time/noise 
ratio.  In such cases the default value of 80, might result in very few 
sub-exposures for the integration.  But the delta value will be quite high, 
indicating that raising the time-noise ratio will greatly improve the potential 
quality of the integrated image.  
+Depending on the various inputs and imaging conditions, the potential quality 
of a sub-exposure can vary greatly. In poor sky quality with little or no 
filtering, the computed sub-exposure time will naturally be short to avoid an 
overwhelming noise from light pollution, and the exposure time relative to the 
computed noise will be low (a low time/noise ratio). To achieve a high quality 
integrated image from low time/noise ratio sub-exposures may require thousands 
sub-exposures.  If the user is concerned about imaging and processing time or 
storage capacity; then a higher time/noise ratio would needed to reduce the 
quantity of sub-exposures. Conversely, when input conditions result in a 
sub-exposure with a long exposure time relative to the computed noise (as with 
narrow-band imaging), the result may be a sub-exposure with a very high 
time/noise ratio.  In such cases the default value of 80, might result in very 
few sub-exposures for the integration.  But the delta value will be quite high, 
indicating that raising the time-noise ratio will greatly improve the potential 
quality of the integrated image.  
 </para>
 
 <para>
diff --git a/doc/exposure-calculator.png b/doc/exposure-calculator.png
index cda0ebca9f..6ffbbf4e1c 100644
Binary files a/doc/exposure-calculator.png and b/doc/exposure-calculator.png 
differ
diff --git a/kstars/ekos/capture/capture.ui b/kstars/ekos/capture/capture.ui
index 0826deb059..51d7cd8ce9 100644
--- a/kstars/ekos/capture/capture.ui
+++ b/kstars/ekos/capture/capture.ui
@@ -782,7 +782,7 @@
                </size>
               </property>
               <property name="toolTip">
-               <string>&lt;html&gt;&lt;head/&gt;&lt;body&gt;&lt;p&gt;Optimal 
sub-exposure calculator&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;</string>
+               <string>&lt;html&gt;&lt;head/&gt;&lt;body&gt;&lt;p&gt;Exposure 
calculator&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;</string>
               </property>
               <property name="text">
                <string/>
diff --git 
a/kstars/ekos/capture/exposurecalculator/exposurecalculatordialog.cpp 
b/kstars/ekos/capture/exposurecalculator/exposurecalculatordialog.cpp
index 3fedcaf60b..2df80d7504 100644
--- a/kstars/ekos/capture/exposurecalculator/exposurecalculatordialog.cpp
+++ b/kstars/ekos/capture/exposurecalculator/exposurecalculatordialog.cpp
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ ExposureCalculatorDialog::ExposureCalculatorDialog(QWidget 
*parent,
         ui->userSkyQuality->setValue(aPreferredSkyQualityValue);
 
         ui->noiseTolerance->setMinimum(0.02);
-        ui->noiseTolerance->setMaximum(200.00);
+        ui->noiseTolerance->setMaximum(500.00);
         ui->noiseTolerance->setSingleStep(0.25);
         ui->noiseTolerance->setValue(5.0);
 
diff --git a/kstars/ekos/capture/exposurecalculator/exposurecalculatordialog.ui 
b/kstars/ekos/capture/exposurecalculator/exposurecalculatordialog.ui
index 3f43d678dd..b41be380a5 100644
--- a/kstars/ekos/capture/exposurecalculator/exposurecalculatordialog.ui
+++ b/kstars/ekos/capture/exposurecalculator/exposurecalculatordialog.ui
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
    </size>
   </property>
   <property name="windowTitle">
-   <string>Sub-Exposure Calculator</string>
+   <string>Exposure Calculator</string>
   </property>
   <property name="toolTip">
    <string/>
@@ -136,6 +136,18 @@
         <property name="toolTip">
          <string>Alter the bias of the noise sources</string>
         </property>
+        <property name="minimum">
+         <double>0.250000000000000</double>
+        </property>
+        <property name="maximum">
+         <double>500.000000000000000</double>
+        </property>
+        <property name="singleStep">
+         <double>1.000000000000000</double>
+        </property>
+        <property name="value">
+         <double>5.000000000000000</double>
+        </property>
        </widget>
       </item>
       <item row="6" column="3" colspan="2">
@@ -969,7 +981,7 @@
              <string>Integration time to noise ratio (potential 
quality)</string>
             </property>
             <property name="decimals">
-             <number>1</number>
+             <number>2</number>
             </property>
             <property name="maximum">
              <double>2000.000000000000000</double>

Reply via email to