On Monday 26 March 2012 21:38:36 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Monday 26 March 2012, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Saturday 24 March 2012 08:35:50 David Faure wrote: > > > [...] > > > This subdir name isn't related to marketing anyway, it's quite internal. > > > But I'm certainly open to changing its name, I'm just pointing out that > > > finding the perfect naming isn't quite trivial... > > > > Agreed. I think I'd try to avoid "kde5" though, it's quite internal > > indeed... put also pops up quite a bit in user support channels. So IMHO > > it'd be better if it wasn't carrying the "kde5" label as we said there > > won't be a "KDE5 platform". > > E.g. for the KDE-related files in extra-cmake-modules, I chose names which > simply contain "KDE", like KDEInstallDirs.cmake.
Which makes sense in that case IMO, since it enforces the conventions followed by the KDE community. > Maybe instead of lib/kde4/ or lib/kde5/ lib/kde-kf5/ , which would mean the > KDE based on kf5 ? The point is: there's no "KDE based on KF5". :-) There will be applications and workspaces based on KF5. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
