2012/8/31 Kevin Ottens <er...@kde.org>: > Now if that was a case of "the framework can't work without the dependency" > I'd have a position similar to your. But here it's depending on the nature of > the plugins, not on what the framework itself needs, that's what rings the > "worth doing it" to me.
I understand your position - but bluntly speaking, my main rationale for all of this was: I don't think it's worth spending too much energy on a hack/solution on something which is not broken and most of all, as David said, will probably be fading out in the near Qt 5.1 future. And I doubt we'll use frameworks-based kservice extensively before that future happens. But again, just my 2c and I'd still welcome any effort on it :) What matters the most in this discussion is that we all agree on approach 1x. > > Regards. > -- > Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net > > KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com > > _______________________________________________ > Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list > Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel > _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
