On Wednesday 19 December 2012 17:28:29 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > Hi, > > now that Qt 5.0.0 has been released, what is the plan with requiring it ? > ASAP or wait to see whether there are issues with it ?
I would like to drop Qt4 support now, yes. The only condition is, as discussed here recently, that all unittests should pass first with Qt5 (so can start from a clean baseline, and not have to wonder if a failure comes from a Qt4/Qt5 difference or from the KF5 changes). Current state on my machine: * kcalendartest fails due to ki18n move (Jon/John, please fix or simply add expected failures if everything is logical in the current state of things) * ktoolbar_unittest, Qt5 bug, for me to fix I guess * kfileplacesmodeltest, for Kévin to fix * plasma-runnercontexttest and plasma-storage - I just wrote in #plasma with hope, after fixing the obvious stuff a few days ago. If you (anyone) experience anything else, please debug, fix, or report here. (Make sure to do this in a separate dbus session as indicated on the wiki page; I'll look into fixing kio|klauncher so that this isn't necessary anymore) > I guess libinqt5/ can be removed then ? Yes, and kde_qt5_compat.h. -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Sponsored by BlueSystems and KDAB to work on KDE Frameworks _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
