On Sunday 17 February 2013, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Saturday 16 February 2013, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > On Saturday, February 16, 2013 18:41:34 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > > There is no kde5. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Everything refering to software, pathes and all that should be kf5. > > > > It does > > > > not make sense for our libs, neither does it make sense for > > > > frameworks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Branding point of view, ignore at will. :P) > > > > > > The tool kde4-config has also been renamed to kde5-config. > > > > > > So if we go with "kde5", I don't see a strong reason to use "kf5" in > > > the plugin install directory. > > > > Just to be clear (I think I wasn't in my previous email): it should be > > kf5, not kde5. > > Just to be clear too, I don't have a strong opinion on the naming, but if > we continue to say that KDE based on kf5 will still be KDE 4, then we > should not use "kde5" in various places. > > What will the version number of the first KDE SC release based on KDE > frameworks be actually ?
Any opinions on this ? Will it be e.g. KDE SC 4.15 ? This would sound more like a normal minor release, but I expect we'll have a few regressions here and there. Alex _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
