On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 1:17 PM, David Faure <fa...@kde.org> wrote: > Le samedi 22 juin 2013 13:03:22 Aleix Pol a écrit : > > Hi, > > We've been looking through some code scratching our heads on how we can > do > > it to workaround uses of KConfig because of it being tier2. > > > > Then we decided to look at it and we saw that KConfigCore and KConfigGui > > only seems to depend on Qt. > > > > So, maybe it could be moved to tier1? > > Yes, it's tier1 now, since I put QLockFile in Qt. > > (It was using kcoreaddons before, for KLockFile). > > Back then I thought "let's not move it, all this will move again anyway", > but > clearly it's confusing people, so yes, please move it :-) > > -- > David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr > Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5 > > Ok, so yes, it's misleading to have it in tier2. Or well, are tiers documented anywhere? We've been looking for it too and haven't found anything yet.
Aleix
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
