On Friday 23 August 2013, Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 7:14 PM, David Faure <fa...@kde.org> wrote: > > On Friday 23 August 2013 06:51:23 Martin Graesslin wrote: > >> Given that it's already lots of work to keep up with the constant > >> breakage due to changes in frameworks the outlook of also having > >> breakage in cmake is nothing I look forward to. > > > > FWIW, I've been using cmake master for many years, and I can't even > > remember *ONE* breakage. > > > > But anyway, I'm fine with not requiring git master, since the thread > > showed that it's not convenient for everyone. > > > > I just wanted to refute the argument about "breakages" :) > > I'll note that build.kde.org has picked up several regressions in the > past, however these were in the CMake "dev" branch, which is expected > to be a little bit more unstable than all the others, as it has been > subject to less testing.
build.kde.org should use the cmake which is required by KF5. If it additionally does builds using cmake from git that's even better. Alex _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
