Hwllo,

On Monday 11 November 2013 15:43:08 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> I see, and agree. So the way forward with kspeech would be to make it
> it's own framework. then at some point turn the header/dbus interface
> into a library that can hide the implementation details of using the
> dbus interface directly, right?
> Something like libkspeech.so that has a class/namespace to interact
> with the speech dbus interface itself.

Yes, I think that's the proper path.

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to