On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Kevin Ottens <er...@kde.org> wrote:

> On Monday 18 November 2013 13:27:19 Aleix Pol wrote:
> > So would it be that bad to have a macro of ours that ends up being just a
> > wrapper to qt5_wrap_ui?
> >
> > Otherwise, this delays the possibility to help the ongoing porting
> process
> > by extending a mandatory dependency on KDE4Support.
>
> Right, we need to cater to that need too. Since that's tied to ki18n use,
> what
> about putting that wrapper macro in ki18n for the time being?
>
> Of course it should be removed when we get a proper fix via CMake 3 around.
> But in the meantime it'll do the trick and allow removing dependencies on
> KDE4Support just for that.
>
> Cheers.
> --
> Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
>
> KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
> Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
>
>
+1

Then I suggest to let this go in:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112785/diff/#index_header

Aleix
_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to