Hello, I thought it'd be interesting to some to get updated stats since my last call to arms.
On Monday 13 January 2014 19:40:54 Kevin Ottens wrote: > This is a reminder that we're still looking for maintainers for our > frameworks. Out of the 57 existing frameworks 25 have no maintainer (yes, that's almost 45%). It's still too much for my taste, but it's better than the 60% we had previously, thanks to the one who stepped up since my last call! The modules without maintainers are spread this way: - 8 are tier 1 (so depending only on Qt); - 4 are tier 2 (depending on Qt and a couple of tier 1); - 11 are tier 3 (larger dependencies) - 2 are tier 4 (kde4support and modules helping for platform integration). > I'd like to thanks all the people who already stepped up to become > frameworks maintainers! And for those still hiding in the dark, here is > your chance at providing a very critical service to our community! > > If you hesitate on becoming a maintainer, feel free to get in touch with me, > we can probably work together to find something where you'll feel at home. > If you have a calling to become a maintainer and already have well formed > tastes and responsibilities you'd like to take, head to the wiki and book > one of the frameworks: > http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List Out of the ones without maintainers, the most critical to get a maintainer are the following ones: * KItemModels; * KConfig; * KGuiAddons; * KWindowSystem; * KCrash; * KDED; * XmlGui. If you feel like you should be the one maintaining some of those, seize the relevant ones on the wiki! Cheers! -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
