> On Jan. 17, 2014, 8:43 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > this would break my workflow given that I install kde4 and kf5 to different > > prefixes. I think this needs a different approach, but please don't ask me > > for it. I'm lacking ideas how we could solve this upstream. > > Hrvoje Senjan wrote: > What about just renaming xml files? Interfaces would be left compatible, > and the files would not conflict. Only it would look a bit ugly, and possibly > confusing... > (To my knowledge, there is no rule/spec that xml must match interface > name, but that could be false ;-)
I think the idea is to move the xml file to kde-workspace somehow? - Martin Tobias Holmedahl ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115078/#review47614 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 17, 2014, 4:07 p.m., Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115078/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 17, 2014, 4:07 p.m.) > > > Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Gräßlin. > > > Repository: kglobalaccel > > > Description > ------- > > don't install dbus interface files in kglobalaccel, these overlap with the > equivalent files in kdelibs4 which causes problems for some distributions > > > Diffs > ----- > > KF5GlobalAccelConfig.cmake.in 5f069d3 > src/CMakeLists.txt d48e92e > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115078/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Jonathan Riddell > >
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
