> On Jan. 29, 2014, 2:29 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
> > kde-modules/KDECompilerSettings.cmake, lines 204-206
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115376/diff/1/?file=240951#file240951line204>
> >
> >     I would have gone for
> >     if (NOT flags)
> >         # CMake can give NOTFOUND as a result
> >         set(flags)
> >     endif()
> >     which may be more resilient to possible changes in the implementation 
> > of get_source_file_property, but I'm not that fussed either way.

Oh right NOTFOUND is considered FALSE. CMake is a weird language :/. Going to 
do it this way, it's more future proof indeed.


- Aurélien


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115376/#review48533
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 29, 2014, 11:17 a.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115376/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 29, 2014, 11:17 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Build System, Extra Cmake Modules, KDE Frameworks, and 
> Alex Merry.
> 
> 
> Repository: extra-cmake-modules
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> When COMPILE_FLAGS is not set, get_source_file_property(flags ${source_file} 
> COMPILEFLAGS) set flags to "NOTFOUND". Leading to interesting build failures 
> in kde-runtime when we then set flags to "NOTFOUND -fexceptions", see 
> http://build.kde.org/job/kde-runtime_frameworks_qt5/58/
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   kde-modules/KDECompilerSettings.cmake 6b7ab4e 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115376/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Built kde-runtime successfully.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aurélien Gâteau
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to