cordlandwehr added a comment.
Looks good to me and I agree that it is a good idea to consistently license everything as LGPL-2.1-or-later. My only question is, how is the X-KDE-PluginInfo-License value is evaluated? Are we free to write any value? Or do we have to extend some mechanism? I would be great to also use SPDX identifiers there! INLINE COMMENTS > metadata.desktop:96 > X-KDE-PluginInfo-Depends= > -X-KDE-PluginInfo-License=GPL > +X-KDE-PluginInfo-License=LGPL-2.1-or-later > X-KDE-PluginInfo-EnabledByDefault=true does this work with our PluginInfo mechanism? actually, I did not yet look into the SPDX license handling in desktop files or any other tooling for outbound licenses for libraries, plugins or applications; same question for the same changes below in the desktop files REPOSITORY R242 Plasma Framework (Library) REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D27640 To: kossebau, #plasma, cordlandwehr Cc: kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, cblack, GB_2, michaelh, ngraham, bruns
