gvgeo added a comment.

  In D26983#629925 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D26983#629925>, @ngraham wrote:
  
  > That's not how this works; reviewers being slow is not a good reason to 
abandon a patch. If you've lost interest in it, you can ask someone else can 
take it over, but just throwing away the work is pretty sad.
  
  
  I'm pretty sure you misunderstood, I wouldn't abandon something because I 
lost interest. Reviewers being SO slow made me revisit this patch many times, 
each time I was seeing the same flaw in it. (Although the trigger to rethink it 
was different this time.)
  If the code was good, it would be indeed sad. But bandaging the problems 
instead of fixing the core, is something that could create even more problems 
in the future.
  The only thing I didn't like, was wasting meven's time who had taken time 
helping me.

REPOSITORY
  R241 KIO

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D26983

To: gvgeo, #frameworks, meven, broulik, dfaure, ngraham
Cc: ngraham, kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, cblack, GB_2, michaelh, bruns

Reply via email to