cgiboudeaux added a comment.

  In D27245#619834 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D27245#619834>, @cordlandwehr 
wrote:
  
  > So, how to move forward with this change? The two open discussion points 
are:
  >
  > - How to handle COPYING files? --> IMO this is a general question that I 
want to address in a global change when we updated all the license headers. For 
this I created a task to track this question: https://phabricator.kde.org/T12730
  
  
  IMO, duplicating the license files is not necessary as long as there are no 
file refering to COPYING.LIB. This could be done now.
  
  > - How to handle the unneeded empty lines in the license file? --> the 
license files must not be changed according to https://reuse.software/faq/, 
thus I created an upstream issue at SPDX 
(https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/issues/60). but I am afraid that we 
have to wait for this issue to be fixed before we can update the license files 
on our side. Judging from experience, this will take quite some time and 
according to the REUSE guidelines we are doing everything correctly.
  
  Let's keep them until https://github.com/spdx/LicenseListPublisher/issues/61 
is fixed.

REPOSITORY
  R249 KI18n

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D27245

To: cordlandwehr
Cc: kossebau, cgiboudeaux, kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, cblack, GB_2, 
michaelh, ngraham, bruns

Reply via email to