bruns added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS
> dfaure wrote in file_unix.cpp:533 > Given that the value of `n` isn't used, any reason why this doesn't iterate > upwards instead, as the old code was doing? I just find it more usual and > readable. To make sure n and length have the same type. Otherwise an int and a ssize_t, or whatever getxattr* return, are compared. REPOSITORY R241 KIO REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D28195 To: bruns, #dolphin, dfaure Cc: kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, cblack, GB_2, michaelh, ngraham, bruns
