Am Freitag, 18. Dezember 2020, 00:31:45 CET schrieb Albert Astals Cid: > El dijous, 17 de desembre de 2020, a les 21:16:57 CET, Ahmad Samir va escriure: > > On 17/12/2020 22:06, David Faure wrote: > > [...] > > > > > Right. That's a reason to fix something indeed, but there are still two > > > ways to fix that, if it was the only reason : either raise min req to > > > Qt 5.14, or ask for a Qt 5.13 CI. > > > > Ben said on IRC: > > "I used 5.14 as a practical matter as 5.13 is essentially unavailable" > > I'm fine going to 5.14, but saying that 5.13 is unavailable is just not the > truth.
Guess it is a matter of defining "available" :) AFAIK Qt 5.13 was not available just by the change of a data point in a table. It would have needed people investing their resources into scratching that itch to create respective custom packages for at least some of the CI- supported operating systems. As well as potentially any other 3rd-party libraries/tools using Qt API that was built/packaged against newer Qt. Cheers Friedrich