On 5/12/26 10:45 PM, 2Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El dimarts, 12 de maig del 2026, a les 20:13:01 (Hora d’estiu d’Europa
central), Marco Martin va escriure:
On Tue, May 12, 2026, 18:15 Marco Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
We (as in Techpaladin) pledge to take up the maintenance of such branch as
long as it's supported, managing backports, testing and releases, as well
as keeping the new CI nodes green
What do you think about it? Is something that looks sensible on the
upstream/community point of view?
Apologies if the next question sounds a bit blunt I didn't figure out how word
it in a somewhat better way.
Is this something we want to pretend the community is doing?
That is, do we want to try to make this "a KDE thing" or is it clearly
structured as a Techpaladin/Kubuntu Focus thing?
For me the second option makes it "simpler".
Then my suggestion would be to just create "vendor" branches like the ones
that we have for example in kleopatra/mimetreeparser/friends
gpg4win/23.10
gpg4win/24.05
gpg4win/gpd-5.0
gpg4win/gpd-5.1
So create something like kubuntufocus/26.04
Maybe it would even make sense to create such branches for KDE Plasma 6.6
(after final 6.6.6 is released) and KDE Gear 25.12?
I assume this would be shipped in *upstream* Kubuntu 26.04, not some
derived version of that?
If that's indeed the case then I'm okay with a more neutral name like
Frameworks/6.24. Doesn't matter that much who is doing it.
