> On March 10, 2014, 4:32 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > > I would say it makes sense. > > > > I wonder why it's not here... > > http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Epics/New_Runtime_Organization
PS: note I'm not the KIO maintainer, you might want to wait for his advise. - Aleix ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116685/#review52481 ----------------------------------------------------------- On March 10, 2014, 12:01 a.m., Luigi Toscano wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116685/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 10, 2014, 12:01 a.m.) > > > Review request for Documentation and KDE Frameworks. > > > Repository: kio > > > Description > ------- > > The special document documentationnotfound is provided by > kde-runtime/khelpcenter and if found it is used by kio-help when the > requested documentation is not available. I think it makes more sense to have > it where kio-help lives. > > > Please note the import would include the (short) history of the > documentationnotfound directory (and its index.docbook and CMakeLists.txt) > extracted from kde-runtime history. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/kioslave/help/CMakeLists.txt 73e1506 > docs/kioslave/help/documentationnotfound/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION > docs/kioslave/help/documentationnotfound/index.docbook PRE-CREATION > src/ioslaves/help/kio_help.cpp d693442 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116685/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > kioclient cat help:/foobar shows the content of documentationnotfound instead > of "There is no documentation available for /foobar." > > > Thanks, > > Luigi Toscano > >
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel