On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Alex Merry <alex.me...@kde.org> wrote:
> On 07/04/14 17:57, Aleix Pol wrote: > > - kioslaves, kioslaves-extra: I'm waiting to get the respositories, the > > sysadmin team seems to have some concerns. Discussing it at the moment > > (when the time zones let us). > > Question: why two? This means kioslaves split across three repos: kio, > kioslaves and kioslaves-extra. I'd have thought that core ioslaves, > like file and http, should go in kio, and others in another repo (called > kioslaves or kioslaves-extra, it doesn't really matter). In fact, > that's what I thought the decision was on this list (although I may have > missed something). > > Alex > _______________________________________________ > Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list > Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel > I was hoping this would have been discussed the last time I proposed the splitting plan. Anyway, file, ftp, http, help and mailto are already in kio framework. The reason we have 2 is that it seemed odd to be releasing together the sftp or smb kioslaves together with cgi or finger. And yes, it's a subjective distinction. Now please, if there are further objections regarding the initial plan, let's start a new thread about it. This is not what this e-mail was meant to be about. Aleix
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
