On Wednesday 19 of February 2014 21:18:31 šumski wrote: > Hi all, > > i've started pushing Frameworks to openSUSE Factory (i.e. next openSUSE > release), and our legal review found some issues[1][2][3] with mentioned > frameworks licenses. > ...
Last items =) KRunner and KActivities are missing COPYING(.LIB), but the 'biggest' remaining issue is kde4support, quote: "The spec file states only that the package is LGPL-2.1+ licensed. Indeed, the predominant license in the source code files does appear to be LGPL-2.1. However, there are instances of other licenses. If this cpp code is compiled with the rest of the LGPL-2.1+ licensed kde4support code, it could be said that the resulting work must be licensed under the GPL-2.0 - this would have a material effect on the overall license of kdesupport4." Should kde4support be declared as GPL-2.0? TIA, and cheers, Hrvoje
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
