Hello, On Tuesday 08 April 2014 19:51:05 Lamarque Souza wrote: > I understood that, I just do not know all the other things we need to do > to make NMQt/MMQt part of KF5. And yes, I agree in making NMQt/MMQt part of > KF5. The other doubt I still have is where _kde_add_platform_definitions > is defined. By what I could figure out it is not in ECM, so something else > is needed to parse the CMakeLists.txt file in current NMQt's framework > branch.
_kde_add_platform_definitions is available in ECM. So from your perspective it means ECM is the only extra dependency as stated several times. > As for my questioning about merging NMQt/MMQt into plasma-nm repo is > because every time I argue that we should make them usable for non-KDE > users arguments like this appears: "I would be really interested how many > distributions would have it [NMQt] without Plasma NM.". Now I am wondering > if I am the only one that still thinks NMQt/MMQt are useful for other > software besides Plasma NM. Honestly, if you really think NMQt/MMQt are to be useful outside of plasma-nm, then KDE Frameworks is likely a good place for them, if not you'd better merge them in plasma-nm. Personally I doubt they're useful outside of plasma-nm though. But that's your job as maintainer to pick a choice. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
