Nice work. Just one thing:
On Monday 18 August 2014 21:54:40 Michael Pyne wrote: > So "kf5-qt5" might mean "KF5/Devel, Plasma5/Devel, etc." while > "kf5-qt5-stable" might mean "KF5/Devel, Plasma5/Stable, etc.". This looks like an attempt to keep the current branch-group naming for compatibility and ease of transition. But I fear it makes things harder to understand in the longer term. Would who guess that kf5-qt5 means plasma devel, since the name says nothing about plasma? I think the concept works, but the actual naming of the divisions should be improved, even if it means we need to update our kdesrc-buildrc files (or some compat code maps from old names to new names). Plasma5Devel-KF5 and Plasma5Stable-KF5 would already be better names for the divisions .... but then what happens with apps on top? :) I guess the divisions will include apps in the same state as plasma? So this is really AppsAndPlasmaDevel-KF5 and AppsAndPlasmaStable-KF5, both quite unreadable :) (Just Devel-KF5 and Stable-KF5 would make one thing the adjective applies to KF5, so no go) Sorry for starting a naming bikeshed, but I fear that the divison concept won't work out well if we can't find proper names for the "divisions", because then people will keep getting confused about what's in them. -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE Frameworks 5 _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
