> On Aug. 29, 2014, 2:42 p.m., Matthew Dawson wrote: > > This looks really awesome. Is there some way for maintainers (or other > > interested parties) to watch their framework's comments, to be on the look > > out for any interesting conversation? Users may make comments about the > > API's that would be good to follow up on. > > > > Thanks for looking into this!
I agree that having the comments forwarded by email to a mailing list (or the maintainers) would have been wonderful, but I have not seen how this could be enabled in the (minimalistic) admin panel of Juvia. I have never developed anything in Ruby but I'll have a look at what Juvia does when a comment is posted. A hack so that comments are forwared somewhere may be possible. - Denis ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119991/#review65506 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Aug. 29, 2014, 2:16 p.m., Denis Steckelmacher wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119991/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 29, 2014, 2:16 p.m.) > > > Review request for KDE Frameworks and Aurélien Gâteau. > > > Repository: kapidox > > > Description > ------- > > Juvia is a Free Software commenting system that can easily be used on static > websites like api.kde.org. An instance of Juvia has just been installed on > commenting.kde.org (many thanks to Ben Cooksley!), and this patch adds > support for it to api.kde.org. > > The users can now comment class pages. The comments are disabled (no comment > box nor anything else appears) on the main page of each framework, on the > Frameworks 5 index page and on any other page that does not directly concern > a class. I've done that in order to avoid cluttering important pages with > comments, but if you think that having comments on all the pages (or a bigger > subset of them) is desirable, it is very easy to change. Personally, I would > avoid having comments on the main pages, so that any spam, if the automatic > Akismet filter does not work, will not be too visible. > > A screenshot is linked to this review request and shows how the comments have > been integrated (I slightly modified the built-in Juvia style so that Doxygen > and KDE colors are used). > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/kapidox/data/htmlresource/kde.css e173dfe > src/kapidox/data/templates/comments.html PRE-CREATION > src/kapidox/data/templates/doxygen.html d00e14e > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119991/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Posting a comment works, and comments can be viewed. They also appear in the > admin interface of Juvia (I've now deleted these comments). I posted comments > on different classes and in different frameworks in order to test that > namespacing works correctly. > > > File Attachments > ---------------- > > Comments on api.kde.org > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/08/29/278299d8-18a6-46a0-ada5-1b6452a3276f__apidox-comments-1.png > > > Thanks, > > Denis Steckelmacher > >
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
