Hi, On Tuesday 24 November 2015 08:57:26 Daniel Vrátil wrote: > On Monday, November 23, 2015 1:09:25 PM CET René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Quick question: gpgmepp is a dependency for kwallet, albeit an optional > > one > > (still not without importance I guess). Why is it part of "applications" > > and not of "frameworks"? > > It was split from kdepimlibs, and we are somewhat slow at pushing stuff from > PIM to Frameworks. Additionally there's a hope that we could upstream it to > GpgME - they are interested in maintaining the C++ bindings, so that would > mean even less work for us - for that reason gpgmepp was not pushed to > Frameworks. > > Andre is the current maintainer of GpgME++, he might new what the current > situation is.
Yes, Werner Koch the GpgME / GnuPG maintainer agreed that we should make gpgmepp the official C++ bindings for GpgME and maintain them as part of gpgme. (which is stated in the gpgme++ repo as the long term plan anyway). The plan is to move the code in gpgme, get a release out that installs gpgme++ under a slightly different name or version and after that take out gpgme++ from the KDE releases / retire the repo. We won't get there before 15.12 though, probably start of 2016. Regards, Andre -- Andre Heinecke | ++49-541-335083-262 | http://www.intevation.de/ Intevation GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück | AG Osnabrück, HR B 18998 Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
