On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Michael Pyne <mp...@kde.org> wrote:
> On Sat, April 23, 2016 13:09:00 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Daniel Vrátil <dvra...@kde.org> wrote:
>> > any chance to get this patch into our Qt build on the CI since it has been
>> > integrated upstream now? As it affects all tests that interact with DBus
>> > it
>> > would be nice to resolve this on the CI.
>>
>> We'll need upstream to update qt5.git (I think that's still required
>> for changes to fully flow through) I think.
>> We could try to hack the patch in, but then we'll end up having to
>> undo that in a few weeks time.
>
> If we're talking about Qt commit 1b9d082b, that appears to already be in the
> 5.6 branch (though not dev). I'm not sure which the CI uses though, if it's
> not 5.6 or less then it is probably more work than its worth to try to
> downgrade (something I've run into too much myself).

The CI system uses the 5.6 branch, from qt5.git.
I've now triggered a build, but as qt5.git hasn't been updated since
our last build I have no idea whether this will pull the relevant
commit in.

>
> Regards,
>  - Michael Pyne

Cheers,
Ben
_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to