On 05/30/2016 12:33 AM, Aleix Pol wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Martin Graesslin <mgraess...@kde.org> wrote:
On Sunday, May 22, 2016 12:22:28 AM CEST Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
So we, in KDE, lack LGPL style code for our de-facto official look and feel.
This is the crucial point. Breeze is not the de-facto official look and feel of
KDE. It's the look and feel of Plasma.
Let's stop there, please. I know where you come from, but here we're
being unhelpful for little reason. The fact that Plasma uses Breeze
doesn't mean that it's Plasma's property. In fact, it's how QtQuick is
shaping up to work for us, shunning Breeze for non-Plasma KDE
applications puts several projects in jeopardy.

We need to decide what we want before assuming everything is set.
Hi,

I am getting so confused by this thread I must say (and by the overall tone of it).
Could someone summarize
1/ which part of the following breeze subdirectories would be concerned by the change ? (I keep hearing about icons, but they are not in the same repo, and by qtquickcontrols but I thought this was handled elsewhere and passed to the QStyle, while the directory here is just a "preview" of how breeze should look)

- cursors
- kdecoration
- kstyle
- lookandfeel.dark
- misc
- printing
- qtquickcontrols

2/ what would be the reason and use case for making the change, and for instance what someone would effectively do with say breeze/kstyle being LGPL that he/she cannot do with it being GPL. (in clear, concrete words, with example)

3/ which projects presently are in jeopardy, how and why ? (again: clear/simple words please)

Sorry if this was already said elsewhere, but the thread is already long, a lot of things have been said, and a lot has been chopped.

Thanks,

Hugo


Aleix
_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to