aacid added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D4422#82875, @anthonyfieroni wrote: > I understand code, it will work now, but to me it's a workaround. Why is it a workaround? > What about to call QIODevice::seek(0) in constructor, other unchanged to original code ? Please, test stuff before suggesting it, saying "No" to every random thing you think may work is not fun. REPOSITORY R243 KArchive REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D4422 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: aacid Cc: anthonyfieroni, #frameworks
