palokisa added a comment.
> Distributions will ship only one variant of kglobalaccel and that will most likely be the one which is wanted by KDE Why is that? Why can't we have e.g. one `foo-kde` and other `foo-lxqt` package, both providing virtual `foo` (these will be in conflict as they will provide the same file(s)). Then KDE can depend strictly on `foo-kde`. REPOSITORY R268 KGlobalAccel REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D5521 To: palokisa, graesslin, mck182 Cc: apol, #frameworks
