chinmoyr marked an inline comment as done. chinmoyr added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS
> fvogt wrote in sharefd_p.h:66 > If that is the case you can do something like: > > #if !defined(__linux__) && !defined(__FreeBSD__) > #error No secure implementation available > #endif I think this is not needed. It's already there in FdReceiver. > sharefd_p.h:47 > { > - return sizeof addr; > + return offsetof(struct sockaddr_un, sun_path) + > strlen(addr.sun_path); > } @fvogt Is +1 for null byte required here? REPOSITORY R241 KIO REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D9966 To: chinmoyr, #frameworks, thiago, fvogt Cc: ngraham, fvogt, lbeltrame, dfaure, michaelh