aaronpuchert created this revision.
aaronpuchert added reviewers: cullmann, dhaumann.
Herald added projects: Kate, Frameworks.
Herald added subscribers: kde-frameworks-devel, kwrite-devel.
aaronpuchert requested review of this revision.

REVISION SUMMARY
  After trying out the highlighting on a larger set of files and reading
  parts of the specification again, I've come to the conclusion that there
  is room for improvement. The following changes are included:
  
  - Sections don't support markup, so we highlight them as "names": \name, 
\keyword, \docType and \encoding.
  - The \email keyword nominally supports markup inside of it, but it's not 
clear how that actually works, so we highlight it as verbatim.
  - We separate R and R-like contexts. The former are actual R code and might 
be executed as such, but the latter will not be executed, and might not even be 
syntactically correct R code. So we don't use R highlighting for R-like code, 
and rather print it as verbatim.
  - We now support \verb and \figure which I forgot for some reason in the 
original version.
  - We added some markup support inside of R code. Note that because we also 
use R highlighting, the markup only works on the top level.
  - Error recovery wasn't any good. When expecting an argument and not getting 
it, we now back off after highlighting whatever comes before the next opening 
brace. Otherwise it's just to noisy when writing code.  We also highlight extra 
spaces before `{` as erroneous.
  - Spell checking makes no sense for R source, item names and errors.

REPOSITORY
  R216 Syntax Highlighting

BRANCH
  improve-rdoc

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D16338

AFFECTED FILES
  autotests/folding/test.Rd.fold
  autotests/html/test.Rd.html
  autotests/input/test.Rd
  autotests/reference/test.Rd.ref
  data/syntax/rdoc.xml

To: aaronpuchert, cullmann, dhaumann
Cc: kwrite-devel, kde-frameworks-devel, #framework_syntax_highlighting, 
michaelh, ngraham, bruns, demsking, cullmann, sars, dhaumann

Reply via email to