ngraham added a comment.

  In D18798#418056 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D18798#418056>, @pino wrote:
  
  > Also, please do not resort to psychological tricks like "torture our 
users", as if this is any worse than any behaviour issues there.
  
  
  There is no psychological trick. This is simply how I see things: we are 
doing this for the users. Users are experiencing this bug. We have a known, 
working, low-risk (or even risk-free) patch that fixes the issue. The patch is 
a workaround rather than a true fix, but this is because nobody has so far 
figured out how to fix the issue itself without introducing substantially more 
risk. Given these conditions, I don't see the harm in landing the patch. 
Everything in life involves trade-offs, and to me, this patch falls into the 
category of "don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good."
  
  I heartily agree with you on the general principle of avoiding workarounds 
and fixing issues at their root causes. However so far nobody has been able to 
do so for this issue. On the other hand, we have a workaround that we already 
know works and does not cause regressions because we already uses it with 
success in other places. In this messy world we live in, sometimes workarounds 
are the lesser evil. The alternative is that this remains broken for users and 
we continue to get bug reports about it.
  
  If you don't have time to dig into this, do you by any chance know anyone who 
does?

REPOSITORY
  R241 KIO

BRANCH
  master

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D18798

To: anemeth, #frameworks, kde-frameworks-devel, ngraham, davidedmundson
Cc: pino, elvisangelaccio, ngraham, kde-frameworks-devel, michaelh, bruns

Reply via email to