meven marked 2 inline comments as done.
meven added inline comments.

INLINE COMMENTS

> bruns wrote in file.cpp:878
> You should start with a more sensible size for lowerLimit, e.g. 256, maybe 
> more - the scope is local, i.e. any excess size is hardly relevant, and 
> allocating 1 and 256 byte cost the same.
> 
> lowerLimit is not used below, I think you don't have to name it.
> 
> You should use (buff.stx_size + 1), as the size is without trailing null byte.

I have 256 as I'd rather allocate the minimal size without adding cost here.

REPOSITORY
  R241 KIO

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D20096

To: meven, #frameworks, dfaure, fvogt, bruns, broulik
Cc: bcooksley, ngraham, kde-frameworks-devel, michaelh, bruns

Reply via email to