On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 4:47 PM Aleix Pol <aleix...@kde.org> wrote: > My impression is that relying on core handlers makes a lot of sense, > there would be some questions to answer such as "what happens when > running on other systems". Maybe for now we could try doing an > in-between? Handling cores on plasma and using drkonqi as we do now > otherwise?
We can't have per-process core handling. Or rather, we can have handling but from a system point of view it'd still be a global handler we set that possibly conflicts with interests of distros and their own handler (ABRT, apport). IOW: there is only one /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern and it doesn't have a per-proc variant. > Does drkonqi work nowadays at all on systems that aren't Linux/BSD? It's certainly not being actively QA'd. Heck, on windows it's not even CI'd because the Qt is too old. Who knows. HS
