kossebau added a comment.

  @zzag Actually, while you commented on that one loop only, the same would be 
valid also for other loops touched in the patch. So, do you want const ref with 
all of them? As you can see by the existing code, it also already used values, 
not const ref, surely also for the reasons I gave. So, how much do you prefer 
const ref just for reading patterns? Shall I change also all the orher places? 
Or is there a chance you can be won for value types in for loops where of 
runtime advantage? :)

  R278 KWindowSystem


To: kossebau, #kwin, zzag
Cc: aacid, kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, GB_2, michaelh, ngraham, bruns

Reply via email to