On Thursday, 22. February 2007 10:55, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > Hi all, > > First, a big 'thank you' for the Qt4 ports - it's great to have it in ports > before KDE will actually need it. > > I have a question about them though. Why is it that session management is > disabled by default (-no-sm option to configure)? Was there a specific > reason to do this? The software I develop relies on this functionality, and > I'd like to be able to depend on the ports. Enabling it doesn't seem to > give me any problems here.
Every third party application I tested (i.e. anything but the Qt4 demos) crashed when run under KDE (3) with session management enabled, that is why it is disabled. I only investigated the issue far enough so I could pinpoint it to the session management support - whether it is a bug in ksmserver, libICE, Qt4 or the crashing Qt4 applications themselves, I cannot tell. I'd be glad if someone could investigate this further and if possible provide a generic fix workaround that could be easily applied ports-wide. Cheers, -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
pgpc4Y8fOhvkT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
