Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > Is there a plan to get qt3 support to the state qt4 > is in? E.g. QMAKE and QMAKESPEC variables are missing.
I'm not sure it's worth the effort as Qt3 is going to become ever more obsolete and there are hardly any new ports added anymore which use it (except for KDE3 applications, but those don't use qmake). On the other hand, it probably wouldn't be hard to do, as far as providing the variables is concerned. Splitting up Qt3 into subports however ... I don't think that would make much sense at this point. At the moment I'm working on factoring the qt4 bits out of bsd.kde.mk into a new bsd.qt(4).mk in order to untangle the logic and to make the macros provided for Qt4 pre/post-include-safe. > Thanks! > > P.S. Is kde@ a closed list? Not at all, anyone can subscribe at https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd. Cheers, -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
