On Friday 18 January 2008 09:00:59 Shane Bell wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:36 am Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > Sure, if you like to - if you do not feel like giving yourself a > > crashcourse on bsd.port.mk in order to be able to write one though, that > > is fine, too - my plan is to start diving into kdesupport tonight or > > tomorrow and that will be a good opportunity to start a basic > > bsd.cmake.mk as I go, which can then be further fleshed out as required. > > > > In any case, no effort is wasted, we can always merge different attempts > > later. ISTR somebody else wrote to the list a while back that they > > started a bsd.cmake.mk themselves, it's not at all too late to submit it. > > Yep that was me and here it is: > http://lysergia.homeunix.net/~decept/philes/ports/bsd.cmake.mk > > It's a bit basic, but should be an okay starting point. > Is support for "out-of-source" builds desirable? > Is there any advantages with out of source builds other than keeping > checkouts clean? >
I'd like to suggest having out-of-source (e.g. staged) builds at least as an option, because you never know what Frankensteinish cmake build software we're going to be seeing. (if the past with auto* is any indication: a lot!). The simple starting point Shane wrote would already simplify current cmake based ports. Dan _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
