On Saturday 02 February 2008 22:14:01 David Johnson wrote:
> On Friday 01 February 2008, David Johnson wrote:
> > Here is a new patch against 4.0.0. I still need to finish testing this.
> > If it all works fine, I'll check it into area51. I'll also test this on
> > Linux, and try to get it in for 4.0.2.
>
> Success! I'll check this in shortly.
>
> While I'm at it, let me make the suggestion that we should think about
> giving qt4 its own directory hierarchy, like we are kde4. Qt can nicely
> co-exist with other versions, but only if paths can unambiguously point to
> the version desired. It would be easier to do this sooner rather than
> later.
>
> Just as suggestion.
+1
It might be enough to leave the binaries where they are, and just have
everything else under /usr/local/qt4/include, etc.
--
Andy Fawcett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"In an open world without walls and fences, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
kde-freebsd mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
