On Friday 10 July 2009 01:12:42 Kris Moore wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Dima Panov wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:32:35 -0700 (PDT), Kris Moore wrote > > > >> SVN commit 4981 by kmoore: > >> > >> Fixed building of py-qt4-gui, still needs runtime testing of course. > >> > >> A files (directory) > >> A files/patch-configure.py > > > > 1. Your patch not connected to build > > 2. gui module isn't needs pyqt.tools(), only qpy_libs() > > 3. btw, xml module isn't needs qpy_libs(), as you suggest. > > 4. build was fixed by latest revision of devel/py-qt4-core, which provide > > patches for all py-qt4 modules. > >
> Ahh, I see your latest patch now, which does fix the building issues. Just > for the record, would it not be easier to provide separate, smaller patches > for the configure.py script in each module? That way you can target > specific build issues for each port, and maybe have less chance of breakage > with each further py-qt release? patch is too complex for split - here is too many internal dependencies and strange module detection logic. -- Dmitry "Red Fox" Panov @ Home | k...@freebsd Team | FreeBSD since September 1995 Khabarovsk, Russia | Skype:dima.panov | Jabber.org:fluffy.khv | ICQ:1745024 _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
