On Thu, 13 May 2010 14:59:48 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Meanwhile, I think we have 2 alternatives. For those ports that need > libassuan they are either updated to work with libassuan 2; or we create > a libassuan-1 port and modify those ports which must have libassuan 1 to > work with it. Versions 1 and 2 of libassuan install the following files > in common: > bin/libassuan-config include/assuan.h share/aclocal/libassuan.m4 > > I would actually kind of like to get rid of the last file altogether > unless it's really needed. As for the first 2 files, a libassuan-1 port > could be modified to install libassuan-1-config and assuan-1.h, and the > ports that have to have version 1 would need to be modified. Ironically, > the library files themselves don't conflict. :) > > So, what is everyone's preference? Either way I'd like to get this > wrapped up by the end of the month. It's not realistic to wait until KDE > 4.5 to upgrade libassuan/gnupg. Can we hear from the maintainers of > kdepim, dirmngr, and gpa as to your preference (support libassuan 2, or > modify to use a libassuan-1) and what kind of timeline you think is > reasonable?
I won't object against update libassuan to version 2 without providing libassuan-1 port. However if libassuan-1 will be created, I'd prefer assuan.h being installed to include/assuan-1/ subdirectory, rather than renaming the file. I don't care about libassuan.m4 and libassuan-config. Max _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
