On Wednesday 16 June 2010 10:22:20 Alberto Villa wrote: > On Wednesday 16 June 2010 11:02:38 Alberto Villa wrote: > > ok, i think i'll fix this, also thanks to a contribution from clang folks > > unfortunately, it really means adding more qmake.conf's, but after > > all > > > there aren't so many compilers > > > > and, of course, it will respect CC > > here's (attached) what i've made so far: please , have a look > i'm not able to test it at the moment because i am at the university > (which means that i could have written all sort of stupid things)... will > do some tests later. meanwhile, if you have suggestions or > complaints, send them (pay attention: the patch was made against qt > 4.7 in area 51... after the tests prove successful, i'll backport it to qt > 4.6 (it requires just a couple of modifications)) > > i've added support for all the c++ compilers i've found in the ports: > gcc(34|42|43|44|45|46), icc, llvm and clang. pcc is not a c++ compiler > as far as i know. if something (even if exotic) is still missing, let me > know. chances are you won't be able to build qt with them (in qt 4.7 > there is at least one test which requires gcc or icc... i've already sent > my complaints to qt developers, and i'll soon patch it), but at least > you'll be able to try > > to make things even more tasty, bsd.qt.mk is able to understand if > `c++` is actually g++ or clang++. yes, clang people, i'm talking to > you :)
I'm actually in favour of upstreaming this: creating the spec files in Qt's source and sending a merge request via gitorious. _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
