On Friday 10 September 2010 07:38:42 Andriy Gapon wrote: > If that's what is needed (e.g. process-shared mutexes), then we are out of > luck. Adding this feature would require some significant changes in > supposedly opaque part of pthreads API implementation. And so it is > unlikely to happen in near future. This has been discussed couple of > times on freebsd-thre...@.
and what dou you know about the semaphores i mentioned? -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD Committer <[email protected]> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla The important thing to remember about walking on eggs is not to hop.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
